|  Newsletter
HGTVPro.com
Andrew & Stacy: The Green Team

« Featured Program - Green Globes | Main | Major Homebuilders "Green Ranking" »

May 7, 2008

Surf's up! Hawaii is first to mandate solar.

Grab a pineapple and put on your grass skirts! Hawaii just passed a law that requires all new homes have solar water heaters installed! Aloha-oh-boy!

The last state to join the Union, (did you know Hawaii wasn't a star on the flag until 1959?) is the first to mandate solar water heaters on all new construction, and sends a strong message to the land-locked rest of us to catch-up or miss the big wave. The law goes into effect in 2010, giving builders, buyers, and designers plenty of time to coordinate the fine details. It also gives distributors, and installers, and code officials a chance to start setting up the supply chain and begin honing their chops.

With an expected cost of around $5,000 per new home, the law will bump up the price tag for new construction. But, homeowners will start saving money on their energy bills before the paint has dried. Also, given the three to five year expected return on investment, residents will be able to sock away a tidy profit thanks to the legislation in no time.

As a bonus, the law doesn't cost the state anything other than a little paperwork. It does, however, spell the end of any existing rebates offered by the state for solar water heaters, those averaged around $2,500, which is bummer for existing homeowners. But, after a few years of supply and demand working its magic, prices on systems and installation should drop considerably.

Hawaii has an interesting energy problem. On the one hand the temperate climate relieves much of the pressure for heating. The locals, from what I've experienced, don't really dig on the air conditioning as much as folks in Texas, Florida, or California where temperatures are seasonally comparable. Once you get outside of the tourist destinations many of the homes are built with open air design allowing for natural heating and cooling. But, on the other hand, while demand may seem relatively less than the continental dwelling, Hawaii has to import 93% of its energy to for electricity, transportation.

I guess that's one of the downsides of living on an island. That and the volcanoes. You can check out more about Hawaii's progressive energy policy here.

So, it seems like a win for homeowners (reduced energy bills), a win for the State (reduced energy requirements), a win for the builder (a fair profit to be made on new technologies) a win for local trades (whole new industry now coming into bloom) and a win for the Earth (solar water heaters reduce energy needs by up to 35%).

I wonder what there would be to complain about?

Proving, again, there's at least one in every crowd, here's a quote at the end of an insightful article on the matter:

"Our country was founded on the principles of freedom and liberty," said Rep. Colleen Meyer, R-Laie-Kahaluu. "More and more, these dictates are coming down to the people saying, 'You have no choice anymore. You have to do what is politically correct.'"

Wow, I wonder how she feels about seat belts, speed limits, and stop signs?

So before I put on my Elvis records and start the pig roast, my question is, how do you come down on this issue? Is it high tide to set sail on the mandating of solar water heaters in the Sun Belt, or, as Rep. Meyer suggests, is this just another liberty squashing bug-a-boo from the feel-good, freedom-hating tree huggers?

And it would be like totally gnarly to hear from folks in the Aloha State about how they feel about this.

Posted by Andrew Hunt at May 7, 2008 12:58 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.scrippsnetworks.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1345

Comments

I'm a fan of solar hot H2O and have seriously considered converting. But to do so, we'd have to cut down three healthy 100+ year old trees that give shade to the south and west sides of the house (i.e., conceptually, passive solar via landscaping). This results in an energy savings for cooling (a necessity in the hot, humid south). And these beauties' job includes converting CO2 to oxygen, so destroying them just isn't an option. Much of our new construction now protects as many trees as possible instead of clear cutting and scraping all the land. Some thought needs to be given to statute flexibility and options prior to locking us into knee jerk legislation that so often produces harmful unintended consequences.

Brian in Alabama

Posted by: Brian at May 13, 2008 10:33 PM

SOME OF THE FACTORS THE STATE IS LEAVING OUT IS WHAT HAPPENS TO THE PART OF THE ISLANDS THAT SEE 30% SUNSHINE AND 70% RAIN..I LIVE APPROX. 12 MILES FROM THE VOLCANO AND HAVE AN ANNUAL RAINFALL AVERAGE OF 132 INCHES OF RAIN PER YEAR..THE SOLAR IDEA DEFINITELY HAS GOOD INTENTIONS BUT THE ONES LEFT IN THE RAIN WOULD HAVE TO WAIT THREE-FOLD FOR THEIR RETURN. GO FIGURE..ALOHA

Posted by: HIRAM KAUKANI at May 14, 2008 12:26 AM

I used to have sun burst panels, then we moved, be careful of scalding water, hope the plan is economical for the older homes and folks benefit, they donated early and should reap some benefits.

Posted by: Gary at May 14, 2008 3:57 AM

While we all want to do what we can for the environment, we just don't want the government dictating every move we make. Where does it stop.

Posted by: j perkins at May 14, 2008 9:11 AM

I agree with the senator just one more step of ther goverment telling us what to do no mater what it cost
us or if we want it.

Posted by: dan at May 14, 2008 9:22 PM

I am a mainlander who has traveled the carribean, but never Hawaii,(go figure, I live in Oregon!) I have built six homes and each time tried to incorporate some green elements. The passive solar gain functions were the only ones that economically made sense. by the time you added the cost for equipment the active systems, including solar hot water did not pay back in less than 12 years.

I also agree there has been a steady progression toward government intrusion in new construction that has helped force up the price of new homes out of reach of many young families. So, even if the Hawaii legislature thinks they are doing something grand for the environment, maybe they had better look at the bigger picture and realize the unintended consequence of good intentions.

Posted by: Sailerman at May 15, 2008 9:11 AM